Collecting the evidence - Packaging & Tagging

When the criminal investigation team gather evidence at the crime scene, there are procedures for the collection and preservation of this evidence. This would be how the investigation team physically collect the evidence and what they use to do this, and also what they use to preserve the evidence for example; the right packaging and tagging of that evidence.

It is important that the investigation team use the right equipment when collecting evidence. This is so they do not damage the evidence or get the best sample of that evidence that they possibly can. An example of this could be using a swab to collect a sample of blood; the investigation team wouldn't use tweezers to collect this because they wouldn't get the best sample from using that piece of equipment. Different pieces of equipment are used to collect the different types of evidence and different packaging will be used for the different types of evidence. The coroner for a deceased would be a way of evidence is collected. The coroner is called out when an individual has died, if this individual is involved in a homicide, this body will be examined.

Packaging of this evidence is important in order to prevent damaging that evidence. This would be the material of the packaging and the size of the packaging. The material pf the packaging plays an important role because if a piece of evidence is not put into the right packaging it could damage or ruin that evidence. An example of this would be if a weapon that had blood on it was put into a plastic container. The box could build up with residue which could ruin the evidence. It’s also important that the evidence is put in a package size suitable for that evidence. For example putting a blood swab in a container and in a sealed plastic bag would be more suitable than putting that evidence in a plastic box.
After the evidence has been packaged correctly, it is a procedure to tag or label that evidence. This label or tag includes important information like the case reference that the evidence belongs to, the date, and identification number, the names of the individuals who have handled that piece of evidence and details of that evidence. This is an important procedure because if this evidence was lost or misplaced, the information on the label should tell that individual enough information to return that evidence to its correct case. Also if the evidence has been tampered with, the names of the individuals who have handled that piece of evidence is on the tag.

Once the evidence has been correctly collected, packaged and tagged, it is then analysed using suitable techniques. Different types of evidence will be analysed using techniques. A presumptive technique most commonly used to analyse blood sample to see whether they are blood would be the Kastle Meyer test. This technique includes adding 3 liquid components; ethanol, Kastle meyer and hydrogen peroxide, onto the sample. A colour change to pink will indicate to the team that the sample is positive for blood. This sample would then be taken back to the labs for examination and further analysis.
Chemical evidence would be analysed using a different technique to biological evidence because they are different types of evidence. A commonly used technique used to analyse drugs which is chemical evidence would be identifying what drug is at the crime scene. Marquis Reagent is a liquid component added to the sample which performs a colour change test which then allows us to identify what drug it is due to that colour change. This technique is only a presumptive test and would be sent back to the labs where further analysis could be performed such as spectroscopy and chromatography.

Other pieces of evidence that may not have been specifically collected from the crime scene but still have involvement in the case would also be analysed. This could be witness statements or surveillance videos.  These would be types of evidence that are produced by technical aids such as CCTV or listening devices. These would be used to identify individuals, look at locations and also the time when those pieces of evidence were produced. Witness statements are important pieces of evidence in investigations because they might be able to identify things that the investigation team may not know because they did not see the crime take place. These would be analysed as to whether they are valuable evidence in the investigation because they can supply detailed information but also may be biased and opinionated statements.

The biological evidence of this case being the fingerprints would have been collected using specific techniques and equipment. The technique to collect these were dusting which involves dusting fine powders to objects or areas intending for the particles of the powder to adhere to residues left by the hands and fingers of individuals. This evidence would then be analysed by forensics in order to try and match that fingerprint to a possible suspect. These fingerprints were preserved in sealed envelopes which were then given to the forensic team. 


Witness statements were valuable pieces of evidence in this investigation. This is because of the lack of physical pieces of evidence that these witness statements could give the investigation team any information and details. These witness statements included reported viewings of an individual carrying a young child who matched Madeleine’s description. This witness statement revealed the ‘Tanner sighting’. Witness statements also given by residents of the holiday destination came forward with information which then made the investigation team question another resident of that area on Madeleine disappearance. This shows that an analysis of the witness statements were carried out which lead to further lines of enquires. Although there were many witness statements given, there were none that saw Madeleine wondering off by herself or a kidnapper abducting Madeleine from the apartment. There were no surveillance videos that gave the investigation team any evidence or leads in the case. If surveillance videos gave evidence, this could have been used to identify any individuals present in the videos and also the location. 

No comments:

Post a Comment